- Thanked 84 times
- Thanked 37 times
Accidentally husband saw on FB. Graham called the pyramid. Looks like that: |
What would you have written an open source, whether it's a blog or forum, readers have the right (and it is used gladly) to accept the written or not. Most often, you will hear a disagreement, especially raising the problematic topic, rather than just telling something everyday.
And when you (the reader) agree, you have less reason and desire to write comments. Could you elaborate on the author said, but he probably already explored the most interesting aspects. When you disagree, you enter the theory or the fact that the author may not be investigated.
And the result is a disagreement between Avrotom and read. These differences can be expressed in different forms. Especially reader is often the face of the Internet becomes the ethics of communication and said those phrases, which are unlikely to be said in life face to face
We turn to the classification
The most nizkointellektualnaya form in conversation.
It does not such a negative form, like swearing. Part of this shape inherent attacks Reader
using arguments not related to general themes written by the author, and are discussed personal characteristics (sex, social, etc.)
CLAIMS to tone
Often used with the previous form, but at this stage we have already the fastest response on the subject written. Contradictions have already manifested some agrumentirovannosti embryo, but is still weak and is unlikely to survive do not develop.
At this stage we finally get responses to what was written, not as it is written or Cam. Most often the goal of this form of "call to battle" or opposing an attempt to formulate the questions at issue. Or tease author.
This is the first form of convincing disagreement. It looks like in the classical form: contradiction plus reasoning and / or evidence of something. For counterargument contradictions are characterized by targeting a variety of subjects of the dispute, ie, two passionately arguing person often arguing about two different things. Sometimes they even agree with each other at the time of intersection proskostey dispute, but in the heat of a completely do not notice it. Most often, these are people who love to argue simply.
DISCLAIMER IN FACT
The most convincing form of disagreement. And also the most rare form because it is preceded by a strong training or experience in the subject of written material. Yes, the hierarchy of the pyramid forms the differences, the higher you go over it, there is less controversial cases find. In this form, you need to have a clear idea of what you do not agree, in which you feel is wrong author. And then we must be able to prove why he is wrong.
Any thought in the written / described / narrated, has its key points, or, if you prefer, the basic idea. The strength of the denials also depends on what you refute it. The most powerful form of disagreement should be aimed at a refutation of this very key point (Ideas) in read authors of materials.
The most obvious advantage of classifying forms of disagreement is that this will help people to evaluate what they read and what they are responsible, and what answers have to read. In fact, we shall designate the intellectual level of a demagogue.
More can be found here -
(there is a link to the source in English in addition to the Russian text if necessary)
About the Author - http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0 ... _ the D0% 9F%%% the BE the D0% the D0% the BB
PS. The above text - translated from English, as far as I understand. There were a lot of mistakes, as a grammatical and stylistic. I clean up that notice. If you still get - poke a finger. Thank you.